The Last Hubble Mission Part 1
>> Sunday, May 24, 2009
For those of you who come here for a healthy dose of space and stuff, you might have been disappointed recently. After all, here we were working one of the greatest telescopes of all time, for the last time, an historic mission that almost didn't happen, and I haven't said a word.
Good heavens, one might wonder, why not? After all, I was the EVA Safety lead on the last two Hubble Servicing Missions. I know this stuff. I know the people doing this work. Why not talk it up on my blog? Why not tell people what was happening when it happened?
Well, I should have. I wanted to. I just couldn't. Not until it touched down safely, which it did this morning, thank goodness. I didn't want to jinx it because this was the mission, of all the remaining Shuttle missions, that scared me most. And they made it back safely. That, for me, is the most important thing.
I'm going to tell you how remarkable this mission was, why what they did was so remarkable, so incredibly, so admirable. I want to tell you about our exceptional crewmembers and the work they did for all of us to get several more years of amazing pictures from the Hubble Space Telescope until the James Webb Telescope is launched. And I will.
Today, though, I'm going to tell you why I was so worried.
A lot has been made of the fact that this mission almost didn't happen. They newspapers sneer over the original reluctance to fly it. The scientists who count on Hubble information decried the reluctance as if it were an irrational prejudice against astronomy. They made the point that ISS was still getting missions.
I was one of those that didn't want to fly this flight. Folks, it's not the same. NASA moved heaven and earth to fly this mission and we will all benefit by it. But it wasn't because it was easy.
See, since Columbia, we've been flying with a backup flight, which we need to launch within weeks in case we see catastrophic (unrepairable) damage on the thermal protection system. But you have some time to wait in a habitable environment that has it's own resources. There is no place to shelter at the Hubble Space Telescope, which is why the rescue mission must be launchable within days, not weeks, which is a sizable constraint.
And transferring from one Orbiter to another isn't as simple as having people leave the ISS into a different Orbiter. Everyone must suit and transfer between too close but not docked Orbiters. Dicey. They had a plan, but it's not like anything we've ever done before.
Also, although the ascent risk is probably comparable between Hubble and ISS missions, the orbital debris environment is not the same. HST is at a higher altitude which has been dirtier than the ISS altitude, for some time. However, two ugly debris incidents the last year or two (the Chinese ASAT test) and the Iridium collision have added a great deal of debris to that (and other) environments as both occured just a bit higher than HST is flying.
But, despite all the challenges (and the considerable challenges in a heavy load of EVAs - which I'll describe in a later post), they pulled it off. They dodged any catastrophic ascent or orbital debris. The faced the fears (and had contingency plans we never had to use) and came out successful. They did a hell of a job and were successful. Our gamble paid off.
I was never so happy to be wrong.
Yeah, I got the feeling from listening to the voices on NASA TV that everybody was very relieved that this one made it home in one piece. And I got a feeling about how worried you were from a couple of your comments when the mission was in progress. Pop the corks! Bubbly for everybody!
Great Post. . . thank you for writing about your work. Fabulous mission. Thank goodness they're home safe. Thank goodness.
It has worried me, Roy, and no one could be more pleased than I that my fears were unfounded.
Agreed, Ko Whitton-Williams. Thanks.
The mission was amazing. I think the public has become way too blasé about space missions.
Just having the Hubble telescope sitting up there in space and beaming back incredible, invaluable pictures is awe-inspiring. But then to be able send up missions to repair it boggles the mind. Well, it boggles my mind. Fortunately, it doesn't boggle everyone's mind. Great news!
Horray, Nasa!
I was chewing nails while I waited for the mission to succeed (probably softer ones than you, though), because without the hubble, what am I going to use as desktop background?
But seriously, I was relieved that everything went well, from what I've read the EVA-missions must have been nightmares. Looking forward to hearing the inside story!
Congratulations to all of you at NASA to make it happen, and to make it happen without (major) incident. I must admit, I nearly swallowed my tongue when I read about the scratches in the heat-shield they reported at the beginning.
Of course the safety of the astronauts is THE most important thing.
But losing Hubble? Sniff, sniff.
Oh Stephanie, I'm so glad it went well and they returned safely! I had no idea it was so very dangerous. I always assume every space mission is dangerous, of course, but clearly some are way more risky than others.
I'm so glad I know you, and that you're willing to give people this sort of insight. Thank you, from the bottom of my heart.
Thanks for sharing your posts on the Hubble mission. I am glad they are home safe and the mission was a success. I watched as much as I could get from the internet and what little news I could get from TV. The major networks just do not cover this stuff like they did in the days of Apollo and I miss the coverage. I don't have cable or satellite and thus can not benefit from the NASA TV network. Streaming media does not work on dial-up. I miss connections to the world of NASA and the happenings in the world of space that we used to get through regular news sources.